Free speech advocates vigorously oppose the bill and say it would usher in an era of ‘thought crimes’ and violate the First Amendment. Advocates say that for more appropriate answers, HSGAC staff should consult the recommendations from …
More: continued here
Such a bogus argument. Much in the same way as arguing that the guarantees of freedom of the press and freedom of speech in the First Amendment do not apply to radio, television and the Internet because those did not exist in the 1790s.
More: continued here
The defendants represented themselves, mounting a spirited defense of their First Amendment rights to protest the gross injustice of abuse and indefinite detention of men at the US Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay. …
More: continued here
“[T]he case could escalate into a major First Amendment showdown with the prospect of jail time or large fines for Mr. Gertz.” -. Reporter Ordered To Testify About Sources – May 30, 2008 – The New York Sun …
More: continued here
Under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the US Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, NY TIMES VS Sulivvan, where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an …
More: continued here
No Passes for Press in R. Kelly Trial(E! Online) E! Online – R. Kelly’s child-pornography trial just took a detour into a First Amendment case. Top. Italian composer sees music in Al Gore’s film (AP). 2008-05-30 19:15 …
More: continued here
You’re saying that regardless of what US citizend did, as long as it was done by valid constitutional procedure, even if it was the repeal of the first amendment, you would not fight? Keep in mind that the first amendment would have to …
More: continued here
The First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The Church of England is not the official church of the United States. The Catholic Church is not …
More: continued here
As that would be a violation of the 1st amendment. Why do you say this, Richard? You’ve repeatedly demonstrated you have no knowledge whatsoever of the first amendment. > This case should not be heard in any court but a civil court. …
More: continued here
Johnson cited a case in which the same court had banned wide-scale frisks of protesters gathered near a military bases based on the protesters’ right to gather to exercise First Amendment rights. Attending a football game, …
More: continued here
