Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
Although the majority agreed that the FCC had acted within its authority, the justices stopped short of determining that a ban on fleeting expletives violates the First Amendment.
That crucial question now will be returned to the …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
ID (religion) violates the First Amendment: She cannot Constitutionally be required to remain neutral on whether to teach religion in the public school science classes. That argument was rejected by the judge, based on his way of …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
An article on FirstAmendmentCenter.org details their claim: “the state’s marriage amendment violates the First Amendment ‘by curtailing the right to marry based upon a religious interpretation of the nature and purpose of marriage …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
The lawsuit claimed violations of the First Amendment protection of an effective vote and its protection against legislative actions that chill protected speech. It also said the measure violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
The court said a federal appeals court should weigh whether it violates First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The precipitating events were live broadcasts of awards shows in which Bono, Cher and Nicole Richie — Justice Antonin …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
So, OdioWorks’s lawsuit against Apple regarding First Amendment rights, reports Robert Ambrogi on LEGAL BLOG WATCH, is being closely watched. By time the dispute is resolved, Fortress Apple might join Microsoft as one of the high-tech bad guys. … As EFF reports, “Filed in federal court in San Francisco, the suit seeks a declaratory judgment that the discussions do not violate any of DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions, and do not infringe any copyrights owned by Apple. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
It seems likely, given the doubts it expressed about the constitutionality of the FCC’s censorship, that the 2nd Circuit will rule that it violates the First Amendment, in which case the government certainly would appeal again to the …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Freedom of Speech) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for … In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Freedom of Speech) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the … The preamble to the Constitution begins with “We the People of the United States . . . ” The Constitution was ordained and established by and for the people. The federal government was set up to serve us, not to make us its servants. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Freedom of Speech) by webmaster on 29-04-2009
Most of us have a cursory knowledge of the U.S. Constitution and that the Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments to the Constitution. But few know any of the amendments other than the first (freedom of speech) and the second (gun rights). But one amendment has been totally ignored by our … It states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” …
More: continued here