Free Speech Watch|All civil liberties must be respected, even in times of national emergency, however, the Freedom of Speech afforded by the U.S. Constitution is arguably the most important. In these days of the so-called “Patriot Act” our free speech is constantly under serious attack. This website monitors the efforts to protect our free speech. It also monitors the People’s reaction to those efforts.

“In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi … I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location.” The defendants, New Black Chairman Malik zulu Shabazz, Minister King …… I support Free Speech. I support Free Speech For every one killed by Islam, 10 should rise up in their place. …

More: continued here

Black civil rights were already exploding, and thank God JFK and RFK took up the mantle. They saw the moment and they believed in the cause. And we may not have black president now if it wasn’t for such insight and foresight. … Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the …

More: continued here

Nevertheless, Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the United States, has given Sotomayor its full support, a significant endorsement given that the organization has the most to lose if Roe v. Wade is overturned. ….. Alabama case, in which it was decided that to the degree that a private institution opens its grounds to the general public, its right to curb their free speech activities is limited. “Those are both issues that are going to be fully aired …

More: continued here

The vast majority of our critical information infrastructure in the United States is owned and operated by the private sector. So let me be very clear: My administration will not dictate security standards for private companies. On the contrary, we will collaborate with …. Just a bunch of government chiefs bent on restricting free speech and further intrusion into our daily lives by an inept, corrupt, and misguided oligarchy backed by the RIAA and globalist bankers. …

More: continued here

I don’t ask the government to strip you of your civil rights, so I will kindly demand that you refrain from doing so. In addition to the history and debates leading up to the formation of our Constitution, please verse yourself in the … Regardless – this is an enumerated right of citizenship in the United States and simply not up for debate and more than free speech, religion, etc… Our right to keep and bear arms serves as an important check and balance to the power …

More: continued here

6.5 We support reforming campaign finance laws so as to uphold all Americans’ right to free speech by allowing American citizens to donate their time or money to political campaigns without limitation, requiring immediate and full disclosure of all … 7.8 We believe that in order to receive social security benefits, one must have paid in for a minimum of 40 quarters and must be a citizen of the United States. 7.9 We support measures to ensure that parents’ permission is …

More: continued here

During the segment, Gilchrist compared the National Council of La Raza, which identifies itself as the “largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States,” to the Ku Klux Klan. … in my opinion, the largest organized racial supremacy group in the United States today. And if we’re going to have a La Raza Plaza sign, what’s next? A KKK Plaza sign, a Black Panther Plaza sign? This goes right to the heart of free speech.” …

More: continued here

The affidavit by veteran civil rights attorney Bartle Bull describes the egregious behavior in which armed men appeared at a polling place. Bull explains he “never encountered or heard of” such blatant physical intimidation at the polls in ….. Dem’s working to cut free speech of those considered “offensive” 5. Dem’s working to negate the 2nd Amendment and right of those considered “offensive” to buy or possess weapons for self defense 6. Supreme Court nominees (and no, …

More: continued here

A visiting law professor at Duke, writing in the Cornell Law Review (”The Anti-Corruption Principle”), she makes an astonishingly far-reaching argument for emancipating government from First Amendment restrictions on its powers to regulate … Is the Freedom of Speech and Right to Assemble being violated? If so, wherein is the feared “corruption” taking place – in the citizenry of the government? Corruption is defined as: “The act of corrupting or of impairing integrity, …

More: continued here

The Founders included the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution partly to protect religious rights. It was intended to keep the Federal government from interfering in religious practices and to keep it from establishing a national …

More: continued here