Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
One must understand that the Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. It trumps all federal, state, and local laws. So for a federal judge being considered for a position on the Supreme Court – the court that interprets the Constitution and how it will be applied … Because blacks scored half what the top three had scored the city feared being sued under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, even though the test results had not shown disparity in the past. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
“A majority of the high court appears to recognize the grave threat to free speech posed by both the electioneering communications ban in McCain-Feingold and the ban on corporate political speech. …. The city says it acted because it might have been vulnerable to claims that the exam had a “disparate impact” on minorities in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Supreme Court to decide discrimination case, say goodbye to Souter in Monday wrap-up …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
The vast majority of abortion opponents in the United States have always embraced non-violence. However, this is not necessarily the case with a small subset of hardcore anti-abortion activists who spend their days — and often earn their livings — organizing protests outside … I have always believed that protests outside abortion clinics, rather than embodying our nation’s powerful tradition of free speech and vigorous debate, actually undermine that legacy. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
The daughter of civil rights lawyer Martin Garbus, Liz made this film in order to explore the many ways our most fundamental of rights is under attack in the United States. Beginning with the post-9/11 “patriotic” crackdown on free …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
2.6 We support a landlord’s right to refuse leasing property and business owner refusing service based on moral grounds of individuals not covered by the Iowa Civil Rights Act. 2.7 We support the elimination of the Iowa Values Fund. …. 6.5 We support reforming campaign finance laws so as to uphold all Americans’ right to free speech by allowing American citizens to donate their time or money to political campaigns without limitation, requiring immediate and full …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
The Landrum -Griffin Act allows all union members the right of free speech in or out of the union hall to maintain UNION DEMOCRACY. Manny claimed the brothers had stated to him that they operated the web site. … is the Labor Union Bill of Rights, was enacted to uphold and protect the US Constitutional rights of all members of all labor unions in the United States. This act essentially allows union members the same civil rights in or out of a union. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
The City of New Haven had argued they were facing threats of litigation by African-American firefighter’s and civil rights groups, and that is why they threw out the test results. … Brandon Scibilia: Coral Springs, FL, United States: My motto: take the word of the man next to you and you are a follower, take the word of the man within you and you are a leader -Brandon Scibilia-. View my complete profile … WELCOME. This is your free speech zone!
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
May 6th, 2009 German court rejects Demjanjuk appealBERLIN — A Berlin court has rejected an attempt by suspected Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk to block his deportation from the United States. Berlin administrative court spokesman Stephan Groscurth says the … But the court, in a 5-4 decision Tuesday, is refusing to pass judgment on whether the Federal Communications Commission’s “fleeting expletives” policy is in line with First Amendment guarantees of free speech. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
The city says it acted because it might have been vulnerable to claims that the exam had a “disparate impact” on minorities in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Supreme Court to decide discrimination case, say goodbye to Souter in … June 8th, 2009 Court to decide if bankruptcy law stifles lawyersWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will decide whether a new bankruptcy law applies to lawyers and whether their free speech rights are violated by a ban on telling clients …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 30-06-2009
Social Media Explorer explores social media, public relations and marketing through commentary and analysis.
More: continued here