Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
Civil rights are inalienable and given by God (and marriage is not one of them). Unfortunately, This IS a political issue because the debate is over changing the definition of marriage because we gave the government the power to … Read Moremanage marriage through … If we define rights as “natural” then free speech isn’t a right, nor gun ownership, nor voting, as ALL of these rights exist in our society as legislative declarations voted into or out of our constitution. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States. 16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights. 17. Get control of the schools. … Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press. 25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
Hopefully theres enough right left to free speech in Philadelphia Pennsylvania to at least post the facts of what is really going. This is not a complaint. This is a Publicly Viewable Post Incident Report demonstrating the quality of … accomplice First Judicial District Family Court Judge Robert J. Matthews. http//hirelyrics.org/209cv04119msg.html None of the Philadelphia Family Court Defendants in the Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights US District Court for the …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
The Massachusetts husband of a gay Brazilian man says his spouse has been denied asylum that would allow them to be reunited in the United States. Tim Coco said yesterday that the Obama administration did not act on a Friday deadline in … Hate that organized some of the protests against big donors to the Prop 8 campaign, said his group targeted only people who contributed $5000 or more to what gays and lesbians in the state considered an assault on their civil rights. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
Hopefully, there’s enough right left to free speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to at least post the facts of what is really going. This is not a “complaint.” This is a Publicly Viewable Post Incident Report demonstrating the quality of life … None of the Philadelphia Family Court Defendants in the Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Kidnap For Profit Child Selling Ring) have had to answer 9/10/09, …
More: continued here
Filed Under (Free Speech) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
The Daily Times reported: “The percentage of taxes on GDP (in Pakistan) is among the lowest in the world… We (the United States) tax everything that moves and doesn’t move, and that’s not what we see in Pakistan,” she said.
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
Because there is nothing I can possibly write, say, think, or espouse that can be that offensive. When they take Fred Phelps off the street, when they take away his First Amendment rights, then I will know I’m in danger. …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
In fact, with a new journalistic shield law, Obama is moving to protect First Amendment rights far more assiduously than Bush ever did–more, in fact, than conservatives would like. But this was never about actual First Amendment rights; …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
“Second thoughts on the First Amendment” from Howard Zinn’s Declaration of Independence raises some starling questions. How free are we really? Are our Constitutional Rights all they are portrayed to be? How interconnected are the media …
More: continued here
Filed Under (First Amendment) by webmaster on 31-10-2009
“The First Amendment necessarily prohibits state censorship, but it does not prevent citizens from using their government to subsidize and spawn independent media [religion].” If this logic works for the press, then it works equally …
More: continued here
