WASHINGTON — A public law school did not violate the First Amendment by withdrawing recognition from a Christian student group that excluded gay students, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a 5-to-4 decision. …
More: continued here
A lower court held that school officials violated a student’s First Amendment right to freedom of speech and expression when they prohibited her from participating in a national day of silent protest against abortion. …
More: continued here
Martinez, saying the group’s (student chapter of the Christian Legal Society) First Amendment rights were not violated by the San Francisco based school’s decision. The Court concluded that public universities may override a religious …
More: continued here
The court concluded that “The loss of a First Amendment right, ‘for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury,” citing Elrod v. Burns. The Sixth Circuit’s ruling followed a June 7, 2010, …
More: continued here
The first amendment to the 1999 constitution entitled: “Constitution (First Amendment) Bill 2010,” which contained 50 amendments in all, was in fact handed over to the state assemblies on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 through the chairman, …
More: continued here
The First Amendment ensures that “if there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or force citizens to …
More: continued here
For instance, should the courts defer to the elected branches when they violate explicit constitutional commands and try to seize our guns or homes? I’d say not, but the same left-leaning justices prone to finding new “unenumerated … Similarly, why should the Supreme Court defer to elected representatives when they set out to ban political speech in clear violation of the First Amendment? President Obama disingenuously demagogued the Court’s recent Citizens United …
More: continued here
Reed. Signatories there claimed that disclosing their names would lead to harassment, intimidation and reprisals; thus, they claimed, disclosure of their identities violated their First Amendment rights. …
More: continued here
The increasingly dangerous Afghanistan situation is worth analysis at two levels, that of the war itself, the ultimately doomed attempt by the United States to conquer the Taliban insurrection and impose a pro-American government, …
More: continued here
The Death of the Bill of Rights. by DerrikKyle on June 30, 2010. Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, …. where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. …
More: continued here
