<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Free Speech Watch &#187; First Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freespeechwatch.org/category/first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freespeechwatch.org</link>
	<description>All civil liberties must be respected, even in times of national emergency, however, the Freedom of Speech afforded by the U.S. Constitution is arguably the most important. In these days of the so-called “Patriot Act” our free speech is constantly under serious attack. This website monitors the efforts to protect our free speech. It also monitors the People’s reaction to those efforts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Passed Up Strange: This week&#039;s glaring example of government &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/08/passed-up-strange-this-weeks-glaring-example-of-government/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/08/passed-up-strange-this-weeks-glaring-example-of-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He said it violated his First Amendment rights to free speech and religion. A Catholic officer, an Air Force rabbi, and the Muslim American Military Association joined Rigdon in his lawsuit. They feared the order would prevent chaplains from &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He said it <em>violated</em> his <em>First Amendment</em> rights to free speech and religion. A Catholic officer, an Air Force rabbi, and the Muslim American Military Association joined Rigdon in his lawsuit. They feared the order would prevent chaplains from <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://passedupstrange.blogspot.com/2012/02/this-weeks-glaring-example-of.html'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/08/passed-up-strange-this-weeks-glaring-example-of-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PropertyProf Blog: Property &amp; the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/08/propertyprof-blog-property-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/08/propertyprof-blog-property-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Concurring Opinions hosted a online symposium on the relationship between the First Amendment and property. Specifically, the symposium has explored Marvin Ammori&#39;s article, First Amendment Architecture, and the important &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Concurring Opinions hosted a online symposium on the relationship between the <em>First Amendment</em> and property. Specifically, the symposium has explored Marvin Ammori&#39;s article, <em>First Amendment</em> Architecture, and the important <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2012/02/property-the-first-amendment.html'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/08/propertyprof-blog-property-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDP proposes bill to reform judiciary, reappoint higher courts &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/06/mdp-proposes-bill-to-reform-judiciary-reappoint-higher-courts/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/06/mdp-proposes-bill-to-reform-judiciary-reappoint-higher-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first amendment proposes changing clause (a) of the article 5 of the Courts Act, reducing the Supreme Court bench to five judges inclusive of the chief justice. The amendment would also dissolve clause (a) of the article 16 in Judges Act &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>first amendment</em> proposes changing clause (a) of the article 5 of the Courts Act, reducing the Supreme Court bench to five judges inclusive of the chief justice. The amendment would also dissolve clause (a) of the article 16 in Judges Act <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://minivannews.com/politics/mdp-proposes-bill-to-reform-judiciary-reappoint-higher-courts-31559'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/06/mdp-proposes-bill-to-reform-judiciary-reappoint-higher-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vermont&#039;s Catholic Bishop Takes a Stand for Religious Freedom &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/06/vermonts-catholic-bishop-takes-a-stand-for-religious-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/06/vermonts-catholic-bishop-takes-a-stand-for-religious-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By its ruling, the Administration has cast aside the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, denying Catholics our Nation&#39;s first and most fundamental freedom, that of religious liberty, and compelling an individual to violate his &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By its ruling, the Administration has cast aside the <em>First Amendment</em> to the Constitution of the United States, denying Catholics our Nation&#39;s first and most fundamental freedom, that of religious liberty, and compelling an individual to <em>violate</em> his <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://truenorthreports.com/vermonts-catholic-bishop-takes-a-stand-for-religious-freedom'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/06/vermonts-catholic-bishop-takes-a-stand-for-religious-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conspiracy to Interfere With Civil Rights &#124; Judge A. Howard Matz, A &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/05/conspiracy-to-interfere-with-civil-rights-judge-a-howard-matz-a/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/05/conspiracy-to-interfere-with-civil-rights-judge-a-howard-matz-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed Class Action In Defense of the First Amendment. LAW CITATIONS: 18 USC 241 Conspiracy Against Rights. 18 USC &#8230; 42 USC 1987 Prosecution of Violation of Certain Laws. 42 USC 1988 Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposed Class Action In Defense of the <em>First Amendment</em>. LAW CITATIONS: 18 USC 241 Conspiracy Against Rights. 18 USC <b>&#8230;</b> 42 USC 1987 Prosecution of <em>Violation of</em> Certain Laws. 42 USC 1988 Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://ahowardmatz.wordpress.com/2012/02/05/government-retaliation/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/05/conspiracy-to-interfere-with-civil-rights-judge-a-howard-matz-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Egnorance: The First Amendment, under a tarp</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/02/egnorance-the-first-amendment-under-a-tarp/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/02/egnorance-the-first-amendment-under-a-tarp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First Amendment guarantees all Americans the right to free exercise of religion and the right to freedom of speech. The First Amendment prohibits an official national church. Nowhere does it guarantee the right not to see other people&#39;s &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>First Amendment</em> guarantees all Americans the right to free exercise of religion and the right to freedom of speech. The <em>First Amendment</em> prohibits an official national church. Nowhere does it guarantee the right not to see other people&#39;s <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2012/02/first-amendment-under-tarp.html'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2012/02/02/egnorance-the-first-amendment-under-a-tarp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chilling: SCOTUS hears case touching on right of Churches to self &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/10/chilling-scotus-hears-case-touching-on-right-of-churches-to-self/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/10/chilling-scotus-hears-case-touching-on-right-of-churches-to-self/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NB] But by casting her legal argument in terms of the government&#39;s interests, rather than the unchanging language of the First Amendment, she left open the possibility that at some future date, under different circumstances, the government &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[NB] But by casting her legal argument in terms of the government&#39;s interests, rather than the unchanging language of the <em>First Amendment</em>, she left open the possibility that at some future date, under different circumstances, the government <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://wdtprs.com/blog/2011/10/chilling-scotus-hears-case-touching-on-right-of-churches-to-self-determination-ministerial-exception-discrimination/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/10/chilling-scotus-hears-case-touching-on-right-of-churches-to-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Action on the Court (of Appeals) &#8211; Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/08/action-on-the-court-of-appeals-gorkemgozleme-sports-worlds/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/08/action-on-the-court-of-appeals-gorkemgozleme-sports-worlds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The theory of the suits was that, by delegating responsibility for construction of the bonfire to a group of students who were not trained or qualified for the task, the university had engaged in outrageous conduct in violation of substantive due process. The Fifth Circuit &#8230; Brentwood Academy, the First Amendment challenge to a high-school-athletics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory of the suits was that, by delegating responsibility for construction of the bonfire to a group of students who were not trained or qualified for the task, the university had engaged in outrageous conduct in <em>violation of</em> substantive due process. The Fifth Circuit <b>&#8230;</b> Brentwood Academy, the <em>First Amendment</em> challenge to a high-school-athletics recruiting ban, a case on which the Supreme Court heard oral argument last month and which was discussed at length here and here. <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.gorkemgozleme.com/action-on-the-court-of-appeals/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/08/action-on-the-court-of-appeals-gorkemgozleme-sports-worlds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court focus shifts to criminal law and First Amendment&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/02/supreme-court-focus-shifts-to-criminal-law-and-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/02/supreme-court-focus-shifts-to-criminal-law-and-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court focus shifts to criminal law and First Amendment. October 2, 2011. Written by Aaron Finestone. Leave a comment. Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports on the upcoming Supreme Court term. &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court focus shifts to criminal law and <em>First Amendment</em>. October 2, 2011. Written by Aaron Finestone. Leave a comment. Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports on the upcoming Supreme Court term. <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://criminaljusticesection.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/supreme-court-focus-shifts-to-criminal-law-and-first-amendment/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/02/supreme-court-focus-shifts-to-criminal-law-and-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court&#039;s focus turns to criminal, First Amendment cases &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/02/supreme-courts-focus-turns-to-criminal-first-amendment-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/02/supreme-courts-focus-turns-to-criminal-first-amendment-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court&#39;s focus turns to criminal, First Amendment cases &#183; Misc. Oct 022011. The Supreme Court, which has been focused in recent terms on the rights of corporations and on curbing big lawsuits, returns to the bench Monday with a &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court&#39;s focus turns to criminal, <em>First Amendment</em> cases &middot; Misc. Oct 022011. The Supreme Court, which has been focused in recent terms on the rights of corporations and on curbing big lawsuits, returns to the bench Monday with a <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.designerchildren.com/supreme-courts-focus-turns-to-criminal-first-amendment-cases/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freespeechwatch.org/2011/10/02/supreme-courts-focus-turns-to-criminal-first-amendment-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

